If there really is a conspiracy/coverup then the 911 truth movment is blaming the wrong adminsitration. After all who had more to gain by the 911 attacks? Yep the democrats. they knew that the Bush tax cuts would get the U.S. economy out of the recession that Clinton left us with. They didnt want Bush and the repubs to prove once and for all that tax cuts actually are the best way to INCREASE tax revenues,which they are. Tax revenues are at all time highs while tax rates are near alltimelows. so think about this,if the Dems could get someone to attack the symbols of the U.S. financial markets(The WTC)and absolutely destoy them that it would lead the U.S. economy and stock markets into a collapse,which it temporarily did. Thereby leading Bush to run up the deficits in order to rebuild the military that was decimated by the previous adminstration. And that Bush would have to spend billions/trillions to defend the secuirty of this great nation.
And consider this. Which party made it nearly impossible for the C.I.A. and F.B.I to exchange info on the 911 terrorist because of the wall that admistration built to prevent such intelligence sharing? The dems of course. And who just happened to be placed on the 911 commission by the dems to cover their arses? Yep the ladie who worked under Janet Reno who created that Wall. Jamie Gorelick. And which President sent one of his cronie into steal and stuff top secret documents down his socks? yep the democrats. And why would that person(Sandy Berger)refuse to take a lie detector test? What do you have to hide Sandy?
And which President had numerous documented chances to kill or capture Osama? yep the dems again. So why didnt clinton take out Osama when he had the chance? And who was the person responsible for giving the OK for the Bin Laden family to be amongst the first to be able fly out of the U.S. after 911? Yep another Clinton cronie none other than Richard Clark. come on people cant you see the obvious.
Of course im just
Of course im just speculating and cant produce any conclusive evidence to support any of my claims . jmho folks and nothing more.
dems and repubs
9/11 cannot be blamed upon one person as the administration would like to do or blamed on one political party, as you just tried to do. Within hours of 9/11, the "experts" claimed that this had to be the work of Osama bin Laden. They "knew" exactly what brought the buildings down, and more evidence is coming out that some members of the media may have been involved in pre-scripting the event.
By the way, the bin Laden Family and the Bush family were once very close business partners in the Carlyle Group. The Project for the New American Century demanded war with Iraq in 1998, and demanded a "pearl harbor style attack" to get the United States of America to support a rise to America's global superpower.
Bush Sr failed, Clinton failed, Bush Jr. Failed and Clinton, Obama, Edwards, Giuliani, McCain, and Romney will fail YOU and they will MAKE money doing so.
Brian, this is not a Republican (oh you are so holy) vs Democrat (those filthy filthy libs) issue. This is a corrupt elite taking control of your country, your money, your family's way of life and obviously your mind.
Some people claim that conspiracy theorist need to "stop drinking cool aid". I would suggest you check your glass.
Im a jkoolaid drinker. Dude you've swallowed the whole pitcher.
And come on Bishop,ive been listening to your show for quite a while now and youre trying to tell me that youve never implicated the Bush adminstration or conservatives in the attacks on 911? I guess i must had been listening to another conspiracy talk show every sat night between 6-8:00. And have you honestly read the PNAC report? and please give me an honest answer. They never "demanded" a pearly harbor like attack on the U.S. And besides that fact,the term pearl harbor attack was only used to describe what it might take for the demcrats to rebuild themilitary which they totally decimated during the clinton regime. You conspiracy nuts misquote that pearl harbor comment the exact same way that you misquute and misuse Larry Silversteins"pull it"comment
And if your going to make an outrageous claim that there were people in themedia that may have been involved in prescripting the 911 attacks....then back it up with some evidence. and please dont use that bogus bbc video. That reporter had been told much earlier by the NYFD,not the U.S gov,that the wtc7 building was in imminent danger of collapsing.
Oh and by the way i rd that famous photo of Oswald in his backyard holding the murder weapon was not fake. I read in one of your blogs that you said that was the first thing that "awoke"you on not believing everything you hear or read. So i guess i have to debuk that b.s. now too. Question....Do you know who admitted taking that photo? Oswalds wife Marina. For someone who dares not to believe everything you hear or read,you sure do fall for every bogus conspiracy without questioning anything those ill-informed morons say.. .
PNAC
Brian,
Thanks for listening to the show. It is always good to get some kind of feedback, even if it is in the form of a poorly structured rant.
Yes, I have read the PNAC document "Rebuilding America's Defense" where it states that a Pearl Harbor style attack would be needed to get the American public to back up a push for America's global super dominance. I have never stated that in the report they say "we need to make a new Pearl Harbor". I have also read the letter to Bill Clinton, publish by PNAC, calling for immediate action against Iraq for a grocery list of reasons. Interestingly enough, those involved in PNAC, came into power, and their hopes and plans to invade Iraq for whatever reason became crystal clear on September 11, 2001.
With that said, the idea of media scripting is apparent in the events on September 11, 2001. I wont refer to the BBC video because I don't need to, even though she talks about building 7's collapse in past tense while the building is standing up behind her for upwards to 20 minutes ... and mysteriously the video feed cuts out just before the collapse.
What I will refer to is the so called "experts" already having the answers to why the towers collapsed hours after the attack. You can find these clips online where "experts" talk about jet fuel and fire and pancake collapse, and they knew that bin Laden was involved within hours of the attacks. Maybe they were getting intel from the same documents release earlier that summer entitled ... oh crap ... Condi, what was the title of that PDB? bin Laden determined to attack in the United States? There were also media reports out that a plane had crashed in or near Camp David, car bombs going off at malls and a lot of other crazy confusing and false information. Call this scripting or poor journalism, either way, the media failed.
I do not put the blame of 9/11 solely on GW or Cheney or even the Neo-cons from PNAC. The blame lies on the Bush admin, the Clinton admin, the Bush Sr. admin, the Reagan admin, the intelligence agencies and the international banking apparatus.
By the way, you are more than welcome, as everyone in the general public is welcome, to call the show and voice your opinions. This is your right as it is my right to voice my opinions.
The supposed faked Oswald photo....
I lmfao everytime i hear someone say that photo was faked. Just like the supposed Osama confession video was faked. The 911 conspiracy nuts take one fuzzy still photo from the video and say that entire video was faked. Despite the fact that the other 90% of the video shows perfect photographic images o f Osama. And beside that fact,whoever faked that video also got someone to impersonate osamas 2 sons and his top deputy.
But back to the supposed fake oswald photo. If you ever want to read about one of the great bitchslappins of all time then just read the warren report. Especailly the part where the supposed photographic expert who claimed the photo was faked getting interviewed.. I cant remember the interviewee but he absolutely destroyed that "supposed"expert. We find out durign the interview that the "supposed"expert knew little about photography and didnt even finish highschool. 30 years later the same clown was used by the O.J. defense team t o claim that the photos o f O.J. wearing those boots used in the murder were faked. Of course about 20 other photos were discovered talem by many different people and that guys testimony became a freaking joke.
Correction it was during the O.J. trial that the so called photo
graphic expert credibility was totally destroyed. imho. I believe it was the Son of the Buffalo bills owner who produce 20 some new photos of O.J. wearing those boots which the so called "oswald fake photo"expert claimed were fake photos of O..J. And to think that some people still actually buy that clowns b.s. that the Oswald photo was faked. Geesh put me on the bishop show for one night and id debunk everything that Bishop believes in.
What about the wedding ring?
What about the wedding ring on the wrong hand and the use of the wrong hand to drink with? Isn't Osama left-handed? Plus, why wouldn't he take credit for it right away instead of saying that he didn't do it and then later say he did? Also where the fuck is he?
You mean to tell me that F-16s always show up two hours late when planes go off course? Are we really that weak with our national defense or just that stupid?
The bottom line is, nobody denies it was a conspiracy, we just argue over who did it, or *let* it be done. I believe the Dem/Rep opposition is a red herring. Like Dr. Bowman says, Clinton deserved impeachment for the rape of Yugoslavia. Dems always come in to tell us everything is alright, like a pacifier, after Reps have bent us over.
More people got arrested at the 1968 and 2004 Democratic Conventions, I saw footage from independent media activists who were allowed to intereview G. Gordon Liddy and Oliver North, who treated them with respect and answered all of their questions, at the Republican Convention that year. And I think neither of them represents what they say they do as parties. It's a classic case of good cop bad cop. It has become a controlled battle politically as much as the wars in the Middle East are controlled wars.
And why not, it's VERY good business.
-- <<<Ted Keylon>>>